I was just reading an article in "Prospect" magazine from a few months ago about literary prizes. I've only got a very limited perspective on this (I don't know how such things are managed in the US) but big fiction prizes like the Booker seem to occupy a sort of middle ground between the smaller, genre-specific prizes (like the CWA, or the Romance Authors awards, which sometimes have the air of an intra-industry private party) and the more obviously "artistic" events like the Turner Prize, which simply provides an opportunity for the tabloid papers to be self-righteously Philistine. I wonder what everyone thinks about literary prizes generally? Are they useful ways of recognising people who contribute to our language's cultural life and give a bit of publicity to struggling writers? Or are they a self-indulgent exercise in propping up the "literary novel" which otherwise would have quietly died because no-one actually wants to read it?
California Literary Review Forum » Books » Across Categories
Literary Prizes
(1 post)-
Posted 9 months ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.
