<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>California Literary Review Forum Topic: Vice-Presidential debate</title>
<link>http://www.calitreview.com/forum/</link>
<description>Just another bbPress community</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:22:24 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Jem Bloomfield on "Vice-Presidential debate"</title>
<link>http://www.calitreview.com/forum/topic/vice-presidential-debate#post-51</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jem Bloomfield</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">51@http://www.calitreview.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm actually not sure how widely it was watched - I think it was screened at something like two o'clock in the morning on the BBC, so anyone wanting to see it had to make the effort!   Personally I cheated and watched it online.  Of course this means that we rely even further on the media to pick out what was relevant and what important about the debate - I do worry that the way Palin's profile is often presented over here is simply encouraging some of the more tedious and simple-minded forms of Yank-bashing that you come across in pubs.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>fitler on "Vice-Presidential debate"</title>
<link>http://www.calitreview.com/forum/topic/vice-presidential-debate#post-48</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>fitler</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">48@http://www.calitreview.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Jem, It's surprising to me that our Vice-presidential debates are shown in England. Do many people watch them?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jem Bloomfield on "Vice-Presidential debate"</title>
<link>http://www.calitreview.com/forum/topic/vice-presidential-debate#post-46</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 13:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jem Bloomfield</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46@http://www.calitreview.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I have to agree with you.  Whatever one thinks of the parties or tickets involved, this was not an impressive performance at all.  I really wish the moderator had exercised a little more control - on both candidates, actually - and just insisted from time to time that they answer the question as asked.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>burt on "Vice-Presidential debate"</title>
<link>http://www.calitreview.com/forum/topic/vice-presidential-debate#post-42</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>burt</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42@http://www.calitreview.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;What was David Brooks of the New York Times smoking when he watched this debate?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;With a bemused smile and a never-ending flow of words, she laid out her place on the ticket — as the fearless neighbor for the heartland bemused by the idiocies of Washington.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Come on! I like Palin as a person, but her debate performance was embarrassing. Winking at the camera. Ignoring the question that was asked and then going on to her two minute canned speeches. I guess when the bar is set that low, anyone can jump over it.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
