Quantcast

California Literary Review

Dean Koontz’s Frankenstein: Book One, Prodigal Son by Dean Koontz and Kevin J. Anderson

by Robert C. Cheeks

May 27th, 2007

Dean Koontz’s Frankenstein: Book One, Prodigal Son
by Dean Koontz and Kevin J. Anderson
Bantam Dell, 512 pp.
CLR Rating: ★★★★★

“I beheld the wretch-the miserable monster whom I had created.”
Mary Shelly,”Frankenstein”

In a poem pregnant with promise, Murder in the Cathedral, T. S. Eliot wrote:

“Yet we have gone on living,
Living and partly living.”

It seems to me that Mr. Eliot has, in a few short words, captured the essence of contemporary man, at least the “civilized” version. He is describing, perhaps, the spiritual devolution of the specie, a slow death of the soul. To the observant, the evidence abounds!

No writer of novels is better prepared to address this condition than Dean Koontz. He has taken it upon himself to examine society’s present milieu under the lens of traditional western mores and in so doing has presented the public with works that are perfectly entertaining and, more importantly, prescient. His protagonists and antagonists, men or women, are defined by the condition of sin that so enthralls us all. The former is cognizant of the condition and acts against it; the latter seeks to welcome it to the point of becoming not only sinful, but evil.

A recent literary critic commented that, “Koontz effectively merges science fiction and horror conventions with Judeo-Christian traditions.” And, I agree with the writer, as far as he goes. But, is Koontz really describing science fiction and horror? Could it be, that in his imagination he has stumbled across a nexus or a link to a metaphysical reality known to only a few? To a reality that is devoid of the niceties of everyday physics where what we call “horror” is more than a titillating moment, but an eternity of despair.

In his latest novel, co-written with Kevin J. Anderson, Dean Koontz’s Frankenstein, Book One: Prodigal Son, the authors’ re-introduce us to characters that were the offspring of the fecund imagination of that sweet and gentle soul, Mary Shelly. Be forewarned that all is not what we expect, not by a long shot. Indeed, the “monster” has a name, Decaulion, and, in fact, he’s no monster. And, the “mad scientist,” Victor Frankenstein, bounds through this drama with a certain elegant, albeit criminal, panache. However, Koontz should not have permitted him to eat at a certain Chinese restaurant!

While Mary Shelly’s Victor Frankenstein was merely a lunatic with a hint of megalomania, the authors have updated Victor. After all he has survived two centuries, and he is now cast as the ultimate scientist, the new rationalist. A man devoid of compassion, love, or kindness, concerned only in achieving his solipsistic definition of perfection, without regard to moral or ethical restraints. He has replaced the old God, set Him aside to whimper in empty monasteries and vacant churches, and mocked Him at every opportunity.

Koontz’s novel is perhaps a response to Dostoevsky’s profound adumbration found in his classic novel, The Brothers Karamazov, “If you were to destroy in mankind the belief in immortality, not only love but every living force maintaining the life of the world would at once be dried up.” And, Victor, who has rejected any faith in a transcendent God, has succeeded in “creating a New Man,” perfect physically but flawed in that he possesses a spiritual ennui that drives him as Decaulion says, “(to) embrace any philosophy that filled the void.” But, Decaulion’s wisdom is irony writ large, a condemnation of man’s inimical philosophies. In describing their painful search for an answer to the nihilistic void he comments, “Freud, Jung, Skinner, Watson….Rorschach. Psychiatrists, psychologists. The most useless gods of all.” And thus the “creature,” sums up the folly of rational man.

In Koontz’s novel the dimensions of the universe are in collision. We are brought to the door of chaos, anarchy, and destruction. In chilling, vivid detail, the authors will keep the reader on the edge of his chair, as they begin the journey toward the ultimate blasphemy!

Prodigal Son is an outstanding read. The second book in the series, City of Night, is due out this summer.


2 Responses to “Dean Koontz’s Frankenstein: Book One, Prodigal Son by Dean Koontz and Kevin J. Anderson”

  • jim Says:

    Having just finished Koontz’s book, I couldn’t wait to drop it in the trash. What a pile of cardboard characters, cliched TV dialog, and hackneyed plot devices! The pompous bombast of this review is a laughable attempt to elevate pulp slop to the status of art.

  • Simon Says:

    I have to agree with Jim… you can quote giants like TS ELiot and Dostoevsky, but that doesn’t make this novel any better… the characters lack depth and the plot is fairly threadbare… the premise is a great one, but there’s not enough Deucalion, and too much of the cops… it’s a below average read (especially after Koontz’s “The Husband” and “Life Expectancy”)… but come one — “Could it be, that in his imagination he has stumbled across a nexus or a link to a metaphysical reality known to only a few?” I don’t think so… He took Shelley’s work and said, “What if they were alive these last 200 years?” An interesting premise, but the result is hardly as flash as you seem to want to make out… I think this critic pumps up Koontz’s work far too much…

Leave a Comment

Search

CLR's most popular articles

Get The Latest California Literary Review Updates Delivered Free To Your Inbox!

Powered by FeedBlitz

Recent Comments:

  • Sudden Onset: Julie notes: I was diagnosed with TM following a sudden attack of pain then severe weakness in my legs. This all happened over a 2 hour period and while I was at work. My boss called...
  • The Strange World of Quantum Entanglement: geoff Harries notes: Examination of my website resolves the wave-particle duality paradox (light or emr is a wave and so removes the need for the...
  • Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer: Dr. Brian Moench notes: Perhaps some of the previous nuclear industry cheerleaders should familiarize themselves with the epidemiologic data that has repeatedly...
  • Jill Bolte Taylor’s Right Brain Wants to Tell Us Something: Sophie notes: Beautiful Picture, and wonderful article too. The video is amazing!! I can’t wait to read MY STROKE OF...
  • The Life of R.K. Narayan: Nitin notes: the best observant and narrative Indian English writer ever known. reading ‘The writerly life’ now..
  • Who Killed JFK? - An Interview With Lamar Waldron: akim holloman notes: I have no doubt in my mind that JFK, RFK, and Mlk were murdered by this goverment. We are currently living under the New...
  • Sudden Onset: Donna notes: I was diagnosed with TM last month. I was in the hospital for 1 week and went home on a walker progressing to a cane and now “limping around”. It’s...
  • Architecture and Modernism: JEHANNE ZEIDAN notes: I WOULD LIKE TO TALK ABOUT THE INTENTIONS OF LE CORBUSIER AND TILL WHAT LIMIT HE SUCCEDED TO APPLY THESE INTENTIONS IN HIS WORK AND LIKE I SEE...
  • Eugene Debs and the Fight for Free Speech: John R. Guthrie notes: This interview with Ernest Freeberg re “Democracy’s Prisoner,” provides a telling commentary on a little remembered...
  • Hanna Rosin Discusses God’s Harvard: anonymous notes: morality can’t be legislated. God Himself NEVER made anyone do anything, that’s why we were created with a will. we as...
  • An Interview With Biographer Ann Seaman: Jorge Dimas notes: I think that she did not help America in any way prayer should be allowed and i can see how she got to ban prayer she was full of bad...
  • Allen Shawn Discusses Phobias: deborah goldman notes: Your poignant and beautiful article “family meal”, which i just finished reading left me in a torrent of tears and filled with...
  • Julian The Apostate: Jim notes: Well said, very interesting reading. :)
  • Dear Minister, America is Headed Down; Can It Reverse Course?: Fartnog Buttstinkle notes: Oh boy, another long-winded anti-American diatribe. Certainly this is a fresh and original article that...
  • City of Fire By Robert Ellis: Laura notes: At first I thought this review was fake. It runs counter to every other review I’ve read about the book, it misquotes the author, and both the...